Monday, October 1, 2012

What Makes a Cool Office?


What Makes a Cool Office?

Short answer: It's more than just a billiards table and free soda. Design buffs weigh in on how to build a creative, collaborative, and innovative workspace.
www.lincolnbarbour.com
The Portland, Oregon, office of Parliament Design has more logs than a cabin. It also features plenty of raw concrete, huge open worktables, classic midcentury-modern chairs, and the odd bear rug for rustic charm.
 
For any company, but especially a start-up, an office is much more than just four walls, a bunch of desks, some laptops, and an instant-coffee machine.

An office is a recruitment tool, a second home, a place to hang out with friends, a place to be inspired, and, particularly for entrepreneurs with huge goals, the place that will serve as the launch pad into building the next billion-dollar company.

So it's no wonder so many founders are obsessed with office design. Jason Freedman, founder of 42Floors, is one of those founders.
"The core job of the CEO is to create the space where people can do incredible work," says Freedman. "And when you think of the CEO's job in that perspective, the office becomes a huge part of the job. And yet, it's also the thing they're least qualified to do, because most of the time they've never done it before."

The motto of 42Floors, which is based in San Francisco, is "discover and create your dream office." The start-up collects real estate data in urban areas, and businesses can search its database of available offices without the use of a broker. It's like Trulia for offices. Naturally, Freedman, who previously founded two companies and is an alumnus of Y Combinator, spends a lot time thinking about office space.

"I think that the key prompt there is: Do you care about your company culture?" he says. "If you do, then the office matters. If you're trying to build a company that's going to last a long time, the office is a key component. It's just as important as the way in which you incentivize your employees. For our employees, when we built our office, the office is their second home. It's an important part of how they see their job."
Raw spaces are in--but they're so much more than exposed beams.

It's undeniable that the "urban rustic" theme—the rough-hewn woods, the antlers on the wall, and the wide-plank floors—has seized the design Zeitgeist. Founders want a space that looks raw or unpolished, and developers are willing to pay for that look in order to attract start-up tenants.

"Now we have the strangest thing in the world happening, where developers are being forced to spend outrageous amounts of money to rip out all this expensive-material wall and ceiling, so it can go back to looking cheap," says Freedman. "The initial part of that was that start-ups took offices that no one else wanted. But they made that space into something cool."

So what is it about the raw aesthetic that's so undeniably charming? What's so enthralling about spending time in a space with exposed red brick walls? What sort of psychology is at play?

"These materials are reminiscent of a time when Americans built physical things," says Marc Kushner, the founder and CEO of Architizer, a social network for architects and interior designers. "It becomes an architectural stand-in for building actual stuff--that's really healthy. It's a rougher design. It's different than design a decade ago, which you sometimes felt was so sleek you were going to slip right off it."

He adds, "All these places are using factory windows with leaded panes, they have a tactility that reminds us of a simpler time. They're picking up on the idea that when people are walking away from their computer screens they want some relief."

In the first dot-com bust, when first-time entrepreneurs were raising tons of capital, the expression of wealth was an important design tactic, says Freedman. It signaled to the best engineers: "Look at us, we've raised the money, and now is your chance to become aligned with the Next Big Thing."



But after the first bubble burst, a general skepticism evolved in the start-up ecosystem. Now, employees want to feel they're actually building something from the ground up.

"People want to feel a part of something bigger than themselves," says Freedman. "And when you're all in it together, when Mark Zuckerberg's desk is just another desk on the floor, and everyone is there, and everyone owns it, then being in a raw space where hierarchy has been ripped out, that makes everyone feel part of something special. People shift from an employee mindset to being a team member."

Open floor plans aren't everything.

If the cartoonish, Dilbert-esque idea of gray cubicles and gray desks and gray filing cabinets sends shivers down your spine, you're not alone. Any "cool" office will eschew the Office Space doldrums of the traditional cubicle layout.

So in the last several years, the move away from cubicle structures and toward more open floor plans, where collaboration is as simple as looking across the desk to see your co-worker sitting five feet away, became incredibly popular. Perhaps almost too popular--some designers believe that an open floor plan isn't the quintessential means for having a "cool" office.

Denise Cherry, the design director at Studio O+A, which has designed offices for Facebook, AOL, Microsoft, Square, and Yelp, believes in the importance of something she calls "tertiary spaces": spaces that aren't conference rooms and that aren't personal desks, either. They're in-between areas that are quiet, where technical people can focus without being locked away in some white-walled room.

"A space that's full of collaborative space but has zero quiet space is just as unsuccessful as a space that's full of offices and has no collaborative space," she says. "It's about finding a balance, and what that balance is for each company. That ratio depends on the type of work that companies do."

Let employees carve out their own space.

By day, Alexa Baggio works in sales at a New York City-based start-up. At night, she's the founder and editor in chief of The Roger, a quarterly magazine devoted to exploring creative workspaces.

"I had this love for creative spaces, and realized there was no medium that was capturing or giving enough attention to the place we all spend the most time," she says. The Roger was launched eight months ago, and in that time, Baggio has scoured the city for creative offices. But the coolest offices, she says, are not necessarily those that have flashy accoutrements or sweeping views, but those that have spent the time to understand what their employees really want.

"As much as it's important to show off the brand in an office, people want to personalize their space," she says. "It's important to create ways for employees to make space their own without it being a detriment to the company if someone left."

At the same time, when you consider the shift to Wi-Fi and laptops, employees don't need to be tethered to one workstation.

"Wireless technology, and the size of the things we carry around, have a big impact on the build environment," says Kushner. "You don't even need a hard drive. You can virtually be anywhere. It's a huge expense to actually wire everything. Once you free up yourself from wires, you have more of a free-for-all. You don't need as many walls. Once you have no file cabinet, that frees you up a little bit. Once you don't have wires, you're actually free."

3 Themes Of Modern Workplace Design


By  | October 1, 2012 at 1:02 am 
Mentoring, socialization, and technology were themes heard throughout the recent IFMA Workplace Summit discussions at Cornell University. These tangible topics aren’t just taking the place of yesterday’s buzzwords like productivity, innovation, and employee experience – they’re helping companies achieve a successful workplace strategy.
The value of mentoring, socialization, and technology lie in the ability to define them within the framework and context of corporate culture, which may make them easier to harness. On a large scale, it seems that we are no longer only concerning ourselves with the “how” and “why” of the physical workspace, but rather moving into discussions about the impacts and integration of culture and organizational strategy within the workspace.
One question asked at the Summit: How do we measure the outcome of mentoring and what is the impact on space?
I would argue that it’s the single most important quality to obtaining high morale and employee investment – yet it does not need to be measured in the traditional sense.
Mentoring is essential to employee investment; without it, a company cannot attract and retain the talent it needs to find success and profitability. Having a well acclimated employee base that works together will undoubtedly help obtain the elusive “productive workspace” designation.
Equally challenged was the concept of reverse mentoring. Putting young employees in a position to support those with more experience on things they are more knowledgeable about — often coming in the form of technology proficiency — helps give them a sense of purpose and cultural importance within an organization.  This leads to a flatter, less hierarchical organization; the future of the workplace, spatially as well as organizationally.
These types of shifts within the organizational structure affect the overall space distribution. They need to be planned for so that all generations can draw on one another’s experience and knowledge.
Facility managers, clients, and real estate advisors are evolving to a more virtual world. Before being able to work virtually in a successful manner, however, it is crucial to develop a working rapport. Without the initial “get to know you period,” there is no way to graduate to a virtual relationship.
During one of the panel discussions at the IFMA Summit, it was stated that once you know an employee, you can read their body language and tone through the phone. For this reason alone, the physical space cannot be devalued as a conductor for a socialized and congruous workforce.
The effects of decreased face-to-face interaction also need to be considered within the scope of mentoring.  How to integrate new employees is often a challenge that we do not concern ourselves with in the built environment.  It is important for young employees to learn by mirroring experienced employees in day-to-day tasks, external client communications, internal company communications, and organizational behaviors.
Beyond the development of working relationships, there should be more value put on socialization itself in the workplace. Casual conversations around family, activities outside of the office, and general conversation about life beyond the office should be considered real work, as this is the establishment of a relationship and trust among co-workers. In creating space, it should be considered crucial to build space that supports this type of communication which facilitates trust and comfort working with one another.
Intranets, virtual workspaces, smart phones all allow us to work around the clock.  It has commonly been the perception that if you are not in the office you are not working. In reality, we are most likely working more now than ever given the continual connectivity.
The advancements of wireless technology are only at the beginning.  How wireless technology will continue to proliferate and revolutionize the work environment was discussed at the Summit. While we cannot predict the future, being able to support and integrate future technologies in our workspace planning will only increase the longevity of a newly constructed space as these technologies become more commonplace.
At the end of the day, the goal is to serve clients and provide a stimulating work environment that supports employees and their work processes.  The physical workspace is integral to achieving a high rate of success for a company but it cannot support users without a successful organizational culture in place.
When we are advising clients on workplace strategy, it is important to understand what the effects are on the organization as a whole. We cannot work alone in a bubble; bringing in key stakeholders, boards, HR, finance and other various groups can only strengthen the case when attempting to modify, rectify or define organizational culture.